<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Info Knowledge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Knowledge Management Tips and Techniques for Individuals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:25:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Author by sapplanningadmin</title>
		<link>http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/author/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>sapplanningadmin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/about-this-blog-2/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Hi Sean,

You saw an early version of the post. I have cleaned it up and added a few things. Check it out again when you get a chance. 

As for the praise, its all deserved. Your engineers and product developers have a lot to be proud of. Box.net has cracked the file management nut that many before Box.net were not able to do. I am working on a new design for knowledge management. It has Box.net for file serving, WordPress for information manager -- linking to Box.net hosted files and combined with the Fujitsu ScanSnap for scanning large documents in a sheet fed manner. This combination -- which is very inexpensive (WordPress = Free + Box.net $15 per month + $425 for the scanner), could completely change how documents are managed at big and small companies alike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sean,</p>
<p>You saw an early version of the post. I have cleaned it up and added a few things. Check it out again when you get a chance. </p>
<p>As for the praise, its all deserved. Your engineers and product developers have a lot to be proud of. Box.net has cracked the file management nut that many before Box.net were not able to do. I am working on a new design for knowledge management. It has Box.net for file serving, WordPress for information manager &#8212; linking to Box.net hosted files and combined with the Fujitsu ScanSnap for scanning large documents in a sheet fed manner. This combination &#8212; which is very inexpensive (WordPress = Free + Box.net $15 per month + $425 for the scanner), could completely change how documents are managed at big and small companies alike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Author by Sean Lindo</title>
		<link>http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/author/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Lindo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/about-this-blog-2/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Hi Shaun,

I&#039;m the Community Manager with Box.net - thank you for the post! Feel free to reach out anytime.

Thanks,
Sean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Shaun,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m the Community Manager with Box.net &#8211; thank you for the post! Feel free to reach out anytime.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Sean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Data Management Easier on The Web by Box.net Drive in the Sky 2 &#171; Info Knowledge</title>
		<link>http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2009/06/15/data-management-easier-on-the-web/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Box.net Drive in the Sky 2 &#171; Info Knowledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/?p=176#comment-41</guid>
		<description>[...] http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2009/06/14/data-management-easier-on-the-web/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2009/06/14/data-management-easier-on-the-web/" rel="nofollow">http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2009/06/14/data-management-easier-on-the-web/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Opera Tab Window Filter by Web Enable Supply Chain &#171; Supply Chain Innovation</title>
		<link>http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/opera-tab-window-filter/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Enable Supply Chain &#171; Supply Chain Innovation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 08:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/opera-tab-window-filter/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>[...] http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/opera-tab-window-filter/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/opera-tab-window-filter/" rel="nofollow">http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/opera-tab-window-filter/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Opera Tab Window Filter by Mac Finder Should Emulate Opera Browser &#171; Info Knowledge</title>
		<link>http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/opera-tab-window-filter/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac Finder Should Emulate Opera Browser &#171; Info Knowledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 14:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/opera-tab-window-filter/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>[...] http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/opera-tab-window-filter/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/opera-tab-window-filter/" rel="nofollow">http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/opera-tab-window-filter/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why SharePoint for RSS? by Is SAP PLM for Real? &#171; SPPLAN - Service Parts Planning</title>
		<link>http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2008/12/17/why-sharepoint-for-rss/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Is SAP PLM for Real? &#171; SPPLAN - Service Parts Planning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2008/12/17/why-sharepoint-for-rss/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>[...] http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2008/12/17/why-sharepoint-for-rss/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2008/12/17/why-sharepoint-for-rss/" rel="nofollow">http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2008/12/17/why-sharepoint-for-rss/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome Excellent at History Management by supersnapp</title>
		<link>http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2008/12/23/google-chrome-excellent-at-history-management/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>supersnapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2008/12/23/google-chrome-excellent-at-history-management/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Yes, Chrome seems much less popular than its capabilities indicate that it should be. History shows some interesting features in this area. It took a long time for Firefox to become successful. Firefox was better than IE in every way for years until it began picking up market share. On the other hand very good browsers like Opera still have not picked up very much market share. How about if Chrome were to integrate in a superior way to GApps and GMarks? That would seem to be a recipe for success. However even if Chrome never becomes all that popular, we are very happy that Google released it. We benefit from all the great products Google releases and releases for free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Chrome seems much less popular than its capabilities indicate that it should be. History shows some interesting features in this area. It took a long time for Firefox to become successful. Firefox was better than IE in every way for years until it began picking up market share. On the other hand very good browsers like Opera still have not picked up very much market share. How about if Chrome were to integrate in a superior way to GApps and GMarks? That would seem to be a recipe for success. However even if Chrome never becomes all that popular, we are very happy that Google released it. We benefit from all the great products Google releases and releases for free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome Excellent at History Management by coffee</title>
		<link>http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2008/12/23/google-chrome-excellent-at-history-management/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>coffee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2008/12/23/google-chrome-excellent-at-history-management/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>it will be interesting to see if Chrome can get as much market share as Firefox; for now they seem to have leveled off...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it will be interesting to see if Chrome can get as much market share as Firefox; for now they seem to have leveled off&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Box.net Drive in the Sky 2 by shaun snapp</title>
		<link>http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/boxnet-drive-in-the-sky-2/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>shaun snapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/boxnet-drive-in-the-sky-2/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Yes, so Brent, you have had enough time to reply. I think the issue is that your definition or access to files is not mine. My definition of access to files is that they can be individually selected. Your definition is simply restoring all the files at once. This is the actual functionality of Mozy and I find it limited.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, so Brent, you have had enough time to reply. I think the issue is that your definition or access to files is not mine. My definition of access to files is that they can be individually selected. Your definition is simply restoring all the files at once. This is the actual functionality of Mozy and I find it limited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Box.net Drive in the Sky 2 by supersnapp</title>
		<link>http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/boxnet-drive-in-the-sky-2/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>supersnapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infoknowledge.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/boxnet-drive-in-the-sky-2/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Ok I would love to revise this post if we are speaking about the same thing. 

What I mean by accessible with a browser is that I can login through any computer and all of my files will be available to me in that browser and I can download as I like. Can one do that with Mozy? I don&#039;t seem to have that option when I login. I am only given the option to restore all files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok I would love to revise this post if we are speaking about the same thing. </p>
<p>What I mean by accessible with a browser is that I can login through any computer and all of my files will be available to me in that browser and I can download as I like. Can one do that with Mozy? I don&#8217;t seem to have that option when I login. I am only given the option to restore all files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
